2005 Audi S4 vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi S4 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi S4 weights approximately 92 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (489 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi S4. (410 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi S4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi S4 | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Audi | Aston Martin |
Model | S4 | Vantage |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7300 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 489 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4382 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2022 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 80 L |