2005 Audi S6 vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-250. (265 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2005 Audi S6.
Because 2005 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi S6 (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-250. (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi S6 | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S6 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |