2005 Audi S6 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S6 (335 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Because 2005 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi S6. (420 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi S6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi S6 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | S6 | XF |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 420 Nm | 500 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.7 seconds | 6.7 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |