2005 Audi S8 vs. 1962 Austin A 40
To start off, 2005 Audi S8 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S8 (247 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S8 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi S8 weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi S8 (450 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Audi S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi S8 | 1962 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | S8 | A 40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 45 L |