2005 Audi S8 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2005 Audi S8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2005 Audi S8. (247 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi S8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi S8 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2005 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi S8. (450 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi S8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi S8 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | S8 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 7206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 545 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 75 L |
