2005 Audi TT vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (217 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 429 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | 60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3230 mm |
