2005 Audi TT vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | XK |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2600 mm |