2005 Audi TT vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A

To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 520 kg more than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (321 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Audi TT 1952 Jeep CJ3A
Make Audi Jeep
Model TT CJ3A
Year Released 2005 1952
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3196 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 321 Nm 145 Nm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1630 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 3130 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2040 mm