2005 Audi TT vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 1,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (179 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 670 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
| Make | Audi | Maserati |
| Model | TT | A6GCM |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2290 mm |
