2005 Audi TT vs. 1954 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 395 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1954 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Audi | Isuzu |
| Model | TT | Minx |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |
