2005 Audi TT vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 325 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | CJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 1958 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2060 mm |