2005 Audi TT vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 643 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TT | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 81 L |
