2005 Audi TT vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | 62 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3187 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 79 L |