2005 Audi TT vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 630 kg more than 2005 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | 62 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |