2005 Audi TT vs. 1964 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (178 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 1013 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1964 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | TT | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |