2005 Audi TT vs. 1965 Riley One-Point-Five
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 3,187 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 620 kg more than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1965 Riley One-Point-Five | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | TT | One-Point-Five |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3187 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 25 L |
