2005 Audi TT vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,187 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 889 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | TT | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3187 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 33 L |
