2005 Audi TT vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (178 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 335 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Audi | DKW |
| Model | TT | Munga |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 31 L |
