2005 Audi TT vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 10 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |