2005 Audi TT vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,188 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 375 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3188 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
