2005 Audi TT vs. 1968 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 715 kg more than 2005 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1968 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | Brougham |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 79 L |