2005 Audi TT vs. 1969 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1969 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1784 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 300 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 29.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 91 L |