2005 Audi TT vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 811 kg more than 2005 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | Sixty |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 2196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3390 mm |