2005 Audi TT vs. 1973 Chrysler 160

To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (178 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 350 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: