2005 Audi TT vs. 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep. (102 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep weights approximately 169 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep. (197 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TT | Jeep |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |
