2005 Audi TT vs. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,269 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (108 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 185 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (321 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (279 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | TT | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 4269 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2850 mm |