2005 Audi TT vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (172 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Celeste |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 172 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |