2005 Audi TT vs. 1981 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1981 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 440 kg more than 1981 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1981 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1981 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | TT | XJR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |
