2005 Audi TT vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,187 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 635 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Audi | Fiat |
| Model | TT | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3187 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 57 L |
