2005 Audi TT vs. 1982 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 245 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1982 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Audi | Plymouth |
Model | TT | Reliant |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2260 mm |