2005 Audi TT vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (225 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Camaro |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1784 cc | 4295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 376 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2650 mm |