2005 Audi TT vs. 1990 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 360 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1990 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Plymouth |
| Model | TT | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2400 mm |
