2005 Audi TT vs. 1994 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,238 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (216 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (302 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1994 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | TT | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3187 cc | 3238 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 216 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 81 L |
