2005 Audi TT vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 335 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | Midge |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |