2005 Audi TT vs. 1996 BMW 840
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 840 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 840 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 840 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2005 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW 840. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 840 (440 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 1996 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1996 BMW 840 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | 840 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 440 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 19.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |