2005 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 365 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |