2005 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia

To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Sentia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Sentia would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 215 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.

Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 2005 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2005 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Audi TT 1996 Mazda Sentia
Make Audi Mazda
Model TT Sentia
Year Released 2005 1996
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1779 cc 2952 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 178 HP 0 HP
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 77.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 70 L