2005 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (225 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TT | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1784 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
