2005 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. (246 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | L 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 246 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2970 mm |