2005 Audi TT vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (217 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2560 mm |