2005 Audi TT vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (217 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 543 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1999 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | TT | C2 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 852 kg |
