2005 Audi TT vs. 2000 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 3,187 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 296 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 SsangYong Rexton. (256 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2000 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | TT | Rexton |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3187 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 256 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 22.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |