2005 Audi TT vs. 2001 BMW Compact
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 115 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Compact. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 2001 BMW Compact | |
| Make | Audi | BMW |
| Model | TT | Compact |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 63 L |
