2005 Audi TT vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (225 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Compass. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 129 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | Compass |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1784 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2660 mm |