2005 Audi TT vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 770 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | Econoline |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3187 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3510 mm |
