2005 Audi TT vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,188 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3188 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3010 mm |