2005 Audi TT vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 256 kg more than 2005 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | TT | Dakota |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1641 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |