2005 Audi TT vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (179 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 230 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Outlander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 59 L |