2005 Audi TT vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 has automatic transmission and 2005 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2005 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | TT | 100 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 8998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |