2005 Audi TT vs. 2005 Saturn Relay
To start off, both 2005 Audi TT and 2005 Saturn Relay were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn Relay is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (247 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Saturn Relay. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2005 Saturn Relay. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn Relay weights approximately 720 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (321 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saturn Relay. (299 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saturn Relay.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2005 Saturn Relay | |
Make | Audi | Saturn |
Model | TT | Relay |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 321 Nm | 299 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 95 L |